If people are calling for firing squads (literally, in Sc.) for sombody who harmed a child, what would they do with a industry built on an utterly insane idea from one Prussian medical student, who upin failing medical school, fled to America with the idea there was a vaccine for every disease. But, by that time as well, Pauling had proved a deficicy of the right nutrients in the right doses is in fact the source of disease and that because of one political and not scientific decision made early on then we went with the shots, thathad been contraversial from the day ther werer invented by the school of homeopaths.

The mad Prussian was Salk and while the no-dead propogranda machine went on and on about polio being eradicated, it was not. In fact of all the vaccine derived viruses, that is viruses that have left the patient to infect others, that they got from the vaccine. I am not making this up.

Many vaccines do this: measles, flu, polio - the shot Salk is credited for, while others such as pertussis screw up the immune system to the point where the vaccinated are th eojnoly ones to catch the disease any more, and since we now kno wmalnutrition even in mcroscopic amounts greatly heigyhtened the degree of pathogenicity of common but usually no-fatal disease slike polio, measles and pertussis. They only produce a disease state if you have a poor diet.

Crazy as that sounds, consider this: twice, back when it was legasl, the US Army tested flu on subhects by deliberatly infected them. They sued a decent number of subjects and the test was repeated with the same results: only half became infected.

Why? The FDA numbers for vitamins were made, literally, for 18 yr old men in the army, at the peak of their health, fed properly with lots of fresh air and exercise. So maybe half get it in that context but since absorbtion rate decreases with age over 18 it is less effective. Thus, the rate of pathogenicity shoots up in proportion to the commensurste increasing nutrient deficiency. Add ot the fact the body needs 10X-100X of those samne substances during disease and it's literally a quick recipe for a slow and miserable death.

The epitome of slow miserable death was AIDS, a cure for which was found in 2007. By 2012 as the public record shows, it was predicted that at these rates, then given enough time somebody in the US House will experience the loss of aloved one from HIV and when and if they ever discover that a could have easily been prevented if some poeple had not ignored overwhelming evidence, and many people would have lived.

Here's the legal rub: say somebody says something to someone that is working directly or indirety for the federal government. If they omit a detalin a report it's a wrist slap. If it's directly related to what they're working on, it's a bit more, but no jail time. If however people died because of this inaction the penalties are maximally severe, 10 yrs.

The legal system is already busting at the seams with the $ value of the fines for pharma co's going nearly asymptotic until thye crepts into the billions, almost as if dulling the populace with lies about the weather would make them not notice their medicines were killing them.


The hearings began on Wed, Jan 28, today is friday and this is what the newspapers have for us today. Sampled are Politico, BBC, CBC and The New Yorker. Percent of content that was substantial varied, with the extreme having a greater percentage of rhetoric with a more dire tone. All were short on facts and data, but at least the Beeb was polite about it.
It's been claimed about Robert Kenndy during his confirmation hearings as Surgeon General that "he did good work but he's strange".

Well, perhaps we can delineate the good work he's done, from however strange his personality might be, not that any of us aren't strange personalities are all no way uh uh.

There are lots of organizations that do what Kennedy does, there's Ionnedes project with Goldacres, whose talks (yt) on bad science in medicine make a compelling case, Ionnedes of course is the guy that proved 9 ouf ot 10 medical papers are not true.

This is one of the few places battling bad science in the US, the Cochrane Foundation in Scandia is one of the more active and better known ones in Europe but they recenly got taken over by industry and booted out the Peter G, who started and and who has done the bulk of the heavy lifting for the past few decadeds.

Dr Peter Gøtzsche (7 mins each)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIIQVll7DYY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dozpAshvtsA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiJcSoo3C4Q


The switcheroo of Kenedy and Trump, both Dmeocrats to the GOP is interesting, because Kennedy and Trump still both want to do as Rupublians now, that they always wanted to do as Democrats - end wars, reign in bug pharma, fix roads and instead we got more roadd decaay and bridges too, more wars and a hysterical US medical system so wrong in so many ways.

So they switch sides, being tiold you can do what you want here and suddenly liberals the left has a coggnitive disconbnect and is now being told by the DNC to oppose thet fucker Kennedy's ideals while Kennedy found that fighting big pharma as a Democrat is not possible even though the scope and breadth of the problem is such that not only does everyone know about it, it's so well known it's even changed our labguage: "big pharma". Remember, we used to call this patent medicine, and slowly, any curative or theraputic agent nbot covered by a patent is of any iunterest in any industrial sense, worse we're getting to the point where some of these natural substances are being regulated (google:"are vitamins regulated in Europe") in some countries.

It is not rational to hate on bobby jr if he is still doing the same thing we always admired him for, and if not him then who? Dr. Oz?

This really applies to Musk as well, and it's even more fun. The Republicans are not the most EV friendly bunch, but now they are, boom, conversion. The left doesn't need to be told to buy EV's, then want clean air. So they buy them anyway, but eww not Tesla so fund other EV ventures? Isn't this what we as liberals wanted?

A few folks may find it hurts sitting down for a while, but this is actually an impoortant and historic moment in history I think, for no matter what anyone things or complains how things are at least we'll all on the correct path now. If we could just get rid of those fantasy hydrogen ads I'd be a happy panda.

So, list the good things rfk has done, and the the issues against him, he loks funny, he talks weird, Caroline said he's an attention seeker - which isn't a bad thing if you have something important to say but most of all I thinkit tells us a lot about his character. Most people whose folks went into politics went home after, he uncle didn't, his dad got stopped just for trying and to channel that immense pain into something good, similar to the way Van Gogh channeled his pain into expressions of ecstatic beauty of the world around us, instead of just giving in and giving up. If I wer given a choice between having every Van Gogh in my living room or finding what rfk has in mind for the next four years then I would prefer the latter.